A portfolio agent that tells you what to buy is a liability, not a tool. It trains you to obey instead of read.
Build the opposite: a watcher whose only job is to notice when reality moves against the thesis you already wrote down, and to hand you the source so you can judge it.
The build, in order:
1. Write the thesis. 3 to 5 testable assumptions you are actually betting on. 2. Map the triggers. Which event in which document could break each assumption. 3. Watch the source, not the price. Filings, calls, and official prints are evidence. The ticker is noise. 4. Demand a source trail. Document, page, and date on every alert, or it does not send. 5. Classify, do not conclude. Confirms thesis, threatens thesis, or unclear. "Unclear" goes on the follow-up list.
Notice what the agent never does: decide if the change is good, what it is worth, or whether you act. That stays with you.
The common mistake is building an oracle. The failure mode is you stop verifying. The discipline is a watcher that always shows its work.
Human judges. AI builds the watcher.
Save this one and build it against your own holdings.
Educational content only. Not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Wall Street Prompt. Always verify against the primary source.