Competitor research should sharpen your packaging. It should never replace your voice.
Most people study a strong post and copy it down to the words. They end up with a feed of look-alikes and no point of view. The fix is to separate the two layers before you touch anything.
The disciplined version, structure borrowed and substance owned:
1. Map the skeleton: hook shape, beat count, where it asks for the save. Write it down with none of their words. 2. Swap in your substance: their topic and examples out, your filings, comps, and verifiable claims in. 3. Run the voice test: read it aloud. If three other accounts could post it verbatim, it is not yours yet. 4. Verify: every figure gets a source, a page, and a date, or it gets cut.
Notice what the reference is not doing. It is not choosing your topic, writing your lines, or vouching for your claims. That stays with you.
This is the same split as the rest of the work. The reference builds the wrapper faster. You still own the judgment about what goes inside it.
Save this one and run it on your next swipe file.
Educational content only. Not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Wall Street Prompt.