Wall Street Prompt · Brand

This AI prompt reads a full 10-K section by section

Instagram post adapted from a SPECIFIC captured source post — exact-source traceability, like our YouTube flow.

Instagram static

Validated — exact source linked@tenfoldmarc

https://www.instagram.com/p/DYNtVlNFDj8/

Observed format: Single static image post: one bold result-claim headline on the image, with a short caption that states a specific number as proof and ends with a comment-keyword CTA to receive a link via DM.

Observed hook: "They got me 47,592 followers in 60 days of creating this account. Wild stuff." followed by "Comment 'viral' and I'll send you the link."

Adaptation: Source -> WSP: result-claim hook ("47,592 followers in 60 days") became a research-throughput claim ("reads a full 10-K section by section" — no unverified time/page figure); the "growth hack" topic became analyst-grade filing analysis; the vague "the link" deliverable became a concrete prompt structure. I changed every word, claim, and visual, kept the static format and the comment-keyword mechanic, and added the WSP guardrails: educational only, no tickers/targets/calls, framed as a workflow that still requires reading the flagged sections yourself. No em dashes, no guru hype, anti-shortcut framing.

On-image text

I built an AI prompt that reads a full 10-K, section by section.

Not skimmed. Structured.

Caption

Paste under the post

I pointed one AI prompt at a full 10-K and pulled the revenue mix, the segment margins, the debt maturities, and every risk factor that actually changed from last year. Start to finish, in one structured pass.

The trick is not "summarize this filing." That gives you a book report. The trick is forcing the model to work like an analyst: cite the exact section, separate what management said from what the numbers show, and flag what changed year over year instead of restating the obvious.

This is a research workflow, not a shortcut around doing the work. You still read the flagged sections yourself. The prompt just gets you to the parts that matter in minutes instead of an afternoon.

Educational only. No tickers, no calls, no targets. Just a faster way to get through the filing.

Comment "10K" and I'll send you the exact prompt structure I use.

Layout

Single 1080x1350 static. Top two-thirds: oversized headline "I built a prompt that reads a full 10-K, section by section." in heavy Montserrat, left-aligned, with "full 10-K" and "section by section" in green for emphasis (NO fabricated time/page numbers). Below it, smaller and lighter: "Not skimmed. Structured." Bottom third: a thin green divider rule, then a single-line terminal-style strip ("comment 10K -> prompt") and the WSP wordmark in the lower-left. Generous near-black negative space so the headline carries the frame.

Design notes

WSP near-black background (#0A0E0F range) with a single green accent (#16E07B / WSP green) used only on the two proof numbers and the divider rule. Montserrat throughout: ExtraBold/Black for the headline, Medium for the subline, Mono-style or Montserrat SemiBold uppercase with tracking for the bottom prompt strip. No photos, no gradients, no clutter. One accent color, one font family, high contrast. The two green numbers are the only visual hierarchy that matters.

Why this works

The source wins on three levers: a hyper-specific number as instant proof (47,592 / 60 days), a curiosity gap about how it was done, and a one-word comment CTA that is frictionless and pumps engagement signals. I kept all three. The proof angle became throughput-without-a-fabricated-metric ("reads a full 10-K section by section"), the curiosity gap became "how do you actually read a filing that fast," and the CTA stayed a single keyword comment. It fits WSP because filings are the exact terrain Dave operates on, and a concrete time-to-insight claim is believable rather than hypey.

CTA

Comment-keyword DM trigger: "Comment '10K' and I'll send you the exact prompt structure I use." Mirrors the source's low-friction single-word comment mechanic, swapping the vague "link" for a concrete, valuable deliverable (the prompt structure) so the payoff is specific and on-brand.