An investor deck is not analysis. It is a sales document. Every chart was chosen, every metric was framed, every weak quarter was cropped out. That is not a criticism. That is the job of a deck.
So do not ask AI "is this a good deal." Wrong job. Ask it to pull every claim onto one page so you can rate the evidence yourself.
The disciplined version, AI extracts and you score:
-> Claim vs. source: list every quantitative claim, then mark which ones cite a filing, an audited number, or nothing at all. -> Metric vs. definition: pull each headline metric and how the deck defines it. "Adjusted," "pro forma," and "annualized run-rate" are definitions, not facts. -> Best case vs. base case: separate what is reported from what is projected. Flag any growth line that needs the projection to work. -> Omission check: ask what a skeptic would expect to see that is missing. Net retention, cohort decay, customer concentration, the down quarter.
Then score each slide Green, Yellow, or Red. Green is verified against a source. Yellow is plausible but unsourced. Red is a claim the deck wants you to accept on trust.
The Reds are not a verdict. They are your question list for management.
What AI is not doing here: deciding if the deck is honest, what the company is worth, or whether you do anything. That stays with you.
Save this and run it on your next deck.
Educational content only. Not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Wall Street Prompt. Always verify against the primary source filings.